#OneFuture
BEYOND NUCLEAR WEAPONS
Nuclear weapons are one of the least inclusive policy areas.
The threat affects us all. Yet too few voices are heard in the debate. If we speak up together, we can make leaders listen.
#OneFuture
BEYOND NUCLEAR WEAPONS
Nuclear weapons are one of the least inclusive policy areas.
The threat affects us all. Yet too few voices are heard in the debate. If we speak up together, we can make leaders listen.
Nuclear weapons policy is controlled by a small group of powerful nations, policy elites and private contractors.
But the costs are paid by everyone else, through reduced public services, militarised societies, and the silencing of marginalised groups and civil movements.
Global voices missing
Many countries without nuclear weapons are advocating for disarmament, but nuclear states refuse to listen. The Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (TPNW) has been signed by 94 countries, yet nuclear states have failed to engage with the process.
Colonial legacies
The debate on nuclear weapons is closely tied to the pernicious legacy of colonialism and global economic and racial inequalities in shaping the nuclear order, from the historical testing of nuclear weapons on areas inhabited by Indigenous and colonised populations, to the two-tier system of nuclear haves and have-nots established under the Non-Proliferation Treaty.
Women and young people sidelined in nuclear policy
Women remain underrepresented in nuclear diplomacy and policymaking, despite the proven benefits of gender-inclusive negotiations. All heads of nuclear states are men and half of Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) Review Conferences have no women delegates at all. Similarly, young people are inheriting the nuclear threat but there are few avenues available for them to contribute to decision-making.
Public opinion ignored
Despite popular support for nuclear disarmament in most nuclear states and aligned countries, nuclear policy is rarely a contested issue during elections. When it is discussed, debate is often framed around candidates' willingness to use these weapons of mass destruction, rather than reducing the risks the create.
History proves that when the public, activists and civil society work together we can push leaders to change course.
New Zealand’s Nuclear Free Zone movement
In the 1980s, strong public opposition to nuclear weapons and testing, fuelled by fears over French tests in the Pacific and U.S. ship visits, led to massive protests and grassroots organising across New Zealand.
The government, responding to public demand, passed the New Zealand Nuclear Free Zone Act (1987), banning nuclear weapons and nuclear-powered ships from entering its territory.
The law remains in force today and is widely celebrated as a democratic victory of public will over superpower pressure.
The Nuclear Freeze movement
Movements like the Nuclear Freeze campaign of the 1980s prove that activism can influence government decisions.
The U.S. movement pressured politicians to address nuclear risks, influencing public opinion and eventually helping set the stage for arms control agreements like the INF Treaty (1987) between Reagan and Gorbachev.
New Zealand’s Nuclear Free Zone movement
In the 1980s, strong public opposition to nuclear weapons and testing, fuelled by fears over French tests in the Pacific and U.S. ship visits, led to massive protests and grassroots organising across New Zealand.
The government, responding to public demand, passed the New Zealand Nuclear Free Zone Act (1987), banning nuclear weapons and nuclear-powered ships from entering its territory.
The law remains in force today and is widely celebrated as a democratic victory of public will over superpower pressure.
The Nuclear Freeze movement
Movements like the Nuclear Freeze campaign of the 1980s prove that activism can influence government decisions.
The U.S. movement pressured politicians to address nuclear risks, influencing public opinion and eventually helping set the stage for arms control agreements like the INF Treaty (1987) between Reagan and Gorbachev.
SPEAK OUT. CALL FOR CHANGE.
Leaders act when they know we care.
Public pressure and diplomatic engagement successfully reduced global nuclear stockpiles by 80% since the Cold War peak. Civil society forced dialogue, halted tests, and froze arms races. Every voice raised helps push decision-makers toward restraint, dialogue, and change.